Police Detective faking a lab report and committing perjury “honest mistake”
Sunday December 16th 2007, 1:02 pm
Filed under: Corruption, Police State, Revolution, US Constitution

From MercuryNews.com:

There was one major problem with the Santa Clara County crime lab report that implicated a San Jose man of sexual assault:

It wasn’t true.

The document was a fake, created by a San Jose police detective. The crime lab analyst who purportedly prepared the document doesn’t exist. The number used to identify it was false.

Even so, detective Matthew Christian testified as though the phony report were authentic.

The case unraveled when the defense attorney sought the résumé of the lab analyst, only to learn there was no such person. Christian then remembered that he had concocted the report in an attempt to trick the defendant, Michael Kerkeles, 54, into admitting that he had forced a developmentally disabled neighbor into sexual acts. It was an acceptable tactic. But Christian said that by the time he was called to testify, more than a year later, he had forgotten the ruse.

The case, which attracted no public attention when it was dismissed last December, has raised concerns both about how the charges were handled and about how police and prosecutors responded when the fabrication and false testimony was discovered.

San Jose police Capt. Andy Galea said last week that after this incident, the department had banned detectives from using ruse crime lab reports when questioning suspects. He declined to say what discipline, if any, Christian received.

Prosecutors said they had referred the case to an internal committee that reviews cases involving allegations of potential criminal conduct by police officers. That committee, headed by Assistant District Attorney David Tomkins, concluded that the matter amounted to an honest mistake by the officer, Chief Assistant District Attorney Marc Buller said last week.

“We all make mistakes,” Buller said.

Are you fucking kidding me? Framing someone has become an honest mistake for a police detective? Did we skip Fascism and go straight to banana fucking republic or what?



Libertarian National Committee urges Ron Paul to run under LP should he lose the Republican Nomination
Tuesday December 11th 2007, 11:12 am
Filed under: 2008 Election, Libertarian Party, Liberty, Revolution, Ron Paul

(Disclosure: I already registered Republican so I can support Ron Paul in the California Primaries but I still get emails from the Libertarian Party)

I just got this email from the Libertarian Party:

FROM THE LIBERTARIAN PARTY:
Dear Libertarian,

Throughout the year, as you could imagine, questions about Ron Paul have been non-stop. Both our members and the media swamp every line of communication available.

While reporters generally dance around the issues, looking for a salacious story about Congressman Paul, our members get right to the point:

“What are you doing to support Ron Paul?”
“Why haven’t you endorsed Ron Paul?”
“Why are you avoiding Ron Paul?”
“Why isn’t…?
“Why is…?
“Why don’t…?”
“Why won’t…?”
“…Support Ron Paul!”

Trust me, in our small Watergate office, the words “Ron Paul” echo throughout the hallways all day, every day, as we respond to the many questions posed by passionate Libertarians who call, e-mail, mail and visit our office.

If you think about it, this appears to put us in a tough position. We’re the Libertarian Party, and Ron Paul is seeking the Republican presidential nomination. It’s not our issue, right?

A party loyalist would not dare say something positive about a member of another party…right? Blind partisan loyalty is why Republicans and Democrats are so powerful…right?

No!

Partisanship is why they are corrupt. The Republican and Democratic parties exist to maintain their own power…that’s about it.

We exist for liberty.

With integrity in our lives and in our organization, Libertarians have fought with long odds for more than three decades. We battle Republicans and Democrats who betray our principles of peace and freedom.

But now, we have a man of principle who is igniting a fire of liberty across the nation and, go figure, he has an “R” next to his name. So, what do we do? To some, this appears to be a black-or-white issue with only two options:

Do we stubbornly stand by and pretend Ron Paul does not exist?

Or . . .

Do we throw out 36 years of work, violate our own bylaws and principles, and convert to the Republican Party and join Dr. Paul?

Both of those are obviously horrible non-options.

What we can do is show respect for our Party’s history, bylaws and members while making an effort to recognize the revolution that’s taking place around the country.

Over this past weekend in Charleston, South Carolina, the members of the Libertarian National Committee (LNC) did just that.

It would be inappropriate and a clear violation of our bylaws for the LNC to simply “nominate” Ron Paul for the Libertarian ticket as many of his supporters have requested. That’s not a decision for the LNC to make–that’s the duty of Libertarian delegates at our National Convention.

What the LNC can do is attempt to “recruit” a presidential candidate, and while in Charleston, the LNC unanimously passed a resolution that states the following:

WHEREAS, the Libertarian National Committee encourages competition in the race for the Libertarian Party’s presidential nomination and is appreciative of all candidates who make the commitment to run;

NOW THEREFORE, in the event that Republican primary voters select a candidate other than Congressman Paul in February of 2008, the Libertarian National Committee urges Congressman Ron Paul to seek the presidential nomination of the Libertarian Party to be decided in Denver, Colorado during Memorial Day weekend of 2008.

I encourage you to read the full resolution by clicking here.

The LNC has made a respectful gesture and it’s up to the good Congressman to accept or decline when he chooses to do so. And just so you know, so far, the response from Dr. Paul’s campaign has been the standard: “We have no intention to seek the nomination of a third party.”

Additionally, the LNC voted to allow me to pursue an effort that will allow Ron Paul supporters to contact voters in the upcoming New Hampshire Republican primary to tell them about Dr. Paul.

They will be able to do this through our resource, www.BallotBase.org, which is essentially a decentralized call center. From the comfort of your own home, you can use the system to call voters on behalf of a candidate. It’s easy to use and can be incredibly effective.

In order to use Ballot Base, you have to register by providing us with your name, address, verified e-mail, etc. and then you can start calling within minutes.

Now, I need you to know that these are very controversial decisions and there are some people who are very upset.

A few are upset that we’ve invited Dr. Paul into our presidential race, while others are up-in-arms that we’ve used LNC resources to benefit a Republican. At first glance, they have an argument, so let me take a minute to FULLY DISCLOSE what this is about, how it works and what we’re possibly giving up and gaining.

We plan to use the Ballot Base to affect a Republican primary. To do so, we give up the following:

* The use of a server that is not even moderately used during the political off-season.
* An independent expenditure of $2,120 to purchase the New Hampshire voter files of registered Republicans.
* Moderate use of staff time.

Now, here’s what we possibly have to gain:

* We make it possible to influence a Republican primary race in the favor of liberty…just as we have done in the past with other primary races.
* We gain the ability to build a lasting relationship with a large group of pro-liberty activists.
* Most importantly, through the Ballot Base registration process, we are able to reach out to many thousands of people who share many common values with the LP. Hopefully, one day down the road, as we continue to build our relationship, they will take the bold step of joining the Libertarian Party or supporting our efforts.

So, for a few thousand dollars, use of a server and some of our time, we are able to create a network of communication with what I hope will be thousands of hard-working and passionate lovers of liberty.

In the meantime, a soft-spoken Republican congressman named Ron Paul gets a leg up over the likes of Rudy Giuliani and Mitt Romney.

Sound good to you?

If so, keep reading, as I need you to do me a very big favor.

Today is December 11th. Thirty-six years ago, our Party was founded by a handful of people who wanted to stand up in defense of liberty. Yep–it’s our 36th birthday!

The decisions made by the LNC this past weekend were bold, decisive and in my opinion, necessary. We can no longer stand by and do nothing when such an incredible opportunity exists for the Libertarian Party.

If you agree with these decisions, show your support by sending us a strong message in the form of a significant gift as we celebrate our 36th birthday. To donate, click here.

I appreciate your continued support and please know that together, we will always remain the Party of Principle.

For Liberty,

Shane Cory
Executive Director
Libertarian National Committee

P.S. If you are behind these efforts, please forward this message to friends and family and ask them to go to www.BallotBase.org to join the effort!

All I’ve got to say is wow! I knew the LP was supportive of Ron Paul but this is something I did not expect to see.

This is a very exciting time in US Politics. We are quite possibly on the eve of a new age of freedom and prosperity in America and this step by the LP just moved us a little bit closer.



According to Google Trends Ron Paul is going to win by a huge landslide
Sunday November 04th 2007, 7:42 pm
Filed under: 2008 Election, Google, Revolution, Ron Paul

I don’t think you can fake out Google Trends folks, this is the real poll in an online world.

read more | digg story



Monks Fighting Against The Military Dictatorship In Burma - Citizens Accepting Tyranny
Sunday September 30th 2007, 6:49 pm
Filed under: Burma, Military Dictatorship, Revolution

Fucking Monks fight back yet the average citizens are too big of fucking pussies, just like people here in the US.

You’ll get more and more of this until everyone starts fighting back.



Ron Paul at PBS’s All-American Presidential Forum in Baltimore Maryland at Morgan State University
Friday September 28th 2007, 7:13 am
Filed under: 2008 Election, Freedom, Revolution, Ron Paul, US Constitution

As usual Ron Paul is getting out the freedom message, and it looks like the crowd here was picking up on what Dr. Paul was putting down!



Where’s your line in the sand?
Sunday August 26th 2007, 11:02 am
Filed under: Freedom, Police State, Revolution



We’re already living in a total police state (Video)



ABC Helping ‘manufacture consent’ on Making USA a Surveillance State
Tuesday July 31st 2007, 9:54 am
Filed under: Cameras, Police State, Privacy, Propaganda, Revolution, Surveillance

Here’s the headline from ABC news:

Surveillance Cameras Win Broad Support
Majority of Americans Favor Extra Safety Factor of Cameras

This is classic propaganda. Report there was a poll, and that the majority of people support an unpopular measure. Most of the sheeple want to fit in, so they will adopt this position, even though they don’t agree with it.

Lets show these people what we think of their cameras. Go get a BB Gun, a hammer, or some spray paint and turn these cameras into expensive metal boxes.



There’s no such thing as “executive privilege”
Monday July 09th 2007, 1:57 pm
Filed under: Bush, Congress, Corruption, Freedom, Revolution, US Constitution

The Bush Administration has once again declared itself above the law. Of course this is a conclusion you have to come to by yourself, as you won’t hear that from the mainstream media. Instead they say the President has claimed “executive privilege” as if this actually means something.

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The idea that the media plays along with this nonsense is proof itself that they are working in collusion with the Bush Administration to give the idea of executive privilege legitimacy. By doing so they are guilty of treason against the US Constitution, by colluding to turn our Republic into a Dictatorship.

You can’t argue that Bush isn’t acting like a dictator. Here are the definition:

dic·ta·tor (dĭk’tā’tər, dĭk-tā’-) pronunciation
n.

1.
1. An absolute ruler.
2. A tyrant; a despot.
2. An ancient Roman magistrate appointed temporarily to deal with an immediate crisis or emergency.
3. One who dictates: These initials are those of the dictator of the letter.

ty·rant (tī’rənt) pronunciation
n.

1. An absolute ruler who governs without restrictions.
2. A ruler who exercises power in a harsh, cruel manner.
3. An oppressive, harsh, arbitrary person.

des·pot (dĕs’pət) pronunciation
n.

1. A ruler with absolute power.
2. A person who wields power oppressively; a tyrant.
3.
1. A Byzantine emperor or prince.
2. An Eastern Orthodox bishop or patriarch.

You can’t really sum it up any better than that.

Is this American? Is this what we want our children to grow up with? The longer we as a people, as Americans, put off dealing with this situation, the bigger losses we’ll suffer when we do finally address it.

Enough is enough.



I just saw the Zeitgeist Movie — WOW!!!

There are a lot of great documentaries out there that cover the fraud that is religion, the 9-11 false flag attacks, and the moneychangers. I’ve seen a lot of them, but never one that puts it all together so well.

Link to Zeitgeist Movie on Google Video and to the Zeitgeist Movie website.

Honestly, the most important thing to understand here is our monetary system. Once you comprehend that system you’ll either be a revolutionary or a banker yourself, depending on what kind of person you are.

Here are some links from the Wiki side of this site that will help you learn more:

Zeitgeist Movie WikiProtest Page

Banking and Monetary Issues

Education

New World Order

WikiProtest.com Main Page