Filed under: 4th Amendment, Police State, Privacy, TSA, Tyranny, US Constitution
Ever seen these pictures??



The ACLU is reporting on the TSA announcement that they will be installing 150 of their body scanners in major airports across America. As you can see above the scanners produces images no different then if you were actually naked.
The TSA has been using it’s press machine to prep America for this stripping of dignity for a while and apparently they think that American are now ready to accept this virtual strip search:
“I saw on the news it might be a little intrusive,” he said. “I personally don’t have a problem.”
Already at six airports nationwide, all passengers are passing through the high-tech machines.
Very quickly we as American are going to have decide if we’re going to accept this gross violation which our government has decided to push forward with. I for one will not be walking through one of these machines or accepting a pat down search.
You have to draw the line somewhere.
Update:
I’ve been seeing a lot of comments about some of pictures being fake. I did take one down that I confirmed was fake but the one that people mention with the hair I’m not sure on. I found all these pics on Google’s image search when I originally wrote this post and I can not verify that any of them are 100% authentic but I will say that they are a good representation of the images produced by these machines.
That said the point of this article was not to examine the detail of the images taken by these body scanning machines. The point was to address the gross violation of privacy and human rights these machines represent. Unfortunately my writing skills really aren’t up to par enough to fully express that so I leave you with an image from the past to provide some perspective:

79 Comments so far
Leave a comment
Great news. I just read that neither TSA, nor the government, is going to make it mandatory for Americans, or anyone else for that matter, to fly on any airline that implements the scanning requirement. I can even take the train, bus, or drive if I wish.
Comment by Tony 12.29.09 @ 2:50 pmYou nailed it Tony. I just checked my copy of the Constitution and Flying is still a service, not a right. If you are really worried about your picture and not just a whiner, then risk your life and ride AMTRAK.
Comment by Jeff 12.29.09 @ 4:42 pmi pay taxes for a “service” so i can walk down the street and go where i want too!!I pay taxes so i shouldnt have to pay for secuity or airport tax. its not a service nor a right when you get legally raped!!!!!
Comment by mike 12.29.09 @ 11:32 pmGiven the latest terrorist would have been caught had the scanner been in place – I’ll take this versus have some idiot blow up my plane. The price of a free society is going up folks.
Comment by Lisa 12.30.09 @ 8:23 pmLisa – Then you should ride the plane naked.
Tony and Jeff – You’re both idiots. Last time I checked, the TSA are paid with MY tax money. Or maybe you’re both welfare queens and don’t pay taxes.
Comment by The Zombieslayer 12.30.09 @ 8:28 pmNot to mention pedophiles and voyeurs lining up for the job.
Comment by Delta 12.30.09 @ 8:46 pmOH SHUT UP YOU TWATS, SO WHAT!!!!
Comment by Gordon 01.01.10 @ 3:13 pmlisa are you not tired of getting raped?
the amount that we pay on so called “security” we could all have our own plane.so lets just bend over and pay for our “free society”.
Tony,Jeff,and Gordon GET A ROOM!!!
I don’t see the problem with a body scan if it will stop terrorist madmen blowing up a plane. So what if trained security officers see your blurred headless naked shape. Seriously have a good look at the first photo above. You have to look hard to realise it’s a women and not a store dummy.
I can’t see how this is rape Mike??? But then you’re obviously a mysognist, homophobic redneck who expects everything for nothing.
Comment by chris 01.03.10 @ 11:19 pmChris- I dont hate women I hate everyone equally
and believe me i have no problem sitting on plane naked,i would make everyone blush.
you know as well as i do that these scanners are a temporary patch and when finally installed they will be useless.
The better cheaper solution is for airports to give everyone a diaper to put on there heads and no planes will blow up!!
TSA is not paid using your tax dollars. They’re a private company, just like blackwater. You might not LIKE to hear this news, you might have thought you were told otherwise, but it’s true. Look into their funding numbers online, and where that funding is coming from.
Comment by PJ 01.04.10 @ 6:30 am@PJ
Are you retarded? The TSA is part of the Dept of Homeland Security and is a government agency, not a private company.
Comment by Jeff419 01.04.10 @ 10:56 amGreat job using photoshopped pics for a post like this. L2P.
Comment by vichle 01.05.10 @ 2:27 amI agree with latest from Mike. You little dummies who say “don’t care…as long as I am safe” or along these lines…I don’t care that some broad would look at my shlong…it’s about the freedom and privacy which is disappearing bit by bit, under all kinds of pretences, or because Americans want to impose their kind of “democracy” on other cultures sending our kids to death. Why should I here, care about some Bedouin who wants to treat his wife like one of his other goats from his heard? Let them be the way they want to be on their sand dunes and find other ways to power our economies other than their oil which we buy at a premium, so they can build kilometer towers and sky slopes in desert.
Comment by dales 01.05.10 @ 10:20 amI’m sure you’d love to have your wife go through one of these things while you standby and knowing someone’s looking at her naked. This compromises who we are as ppl and is desensitizing us in ways unparallel… whether you know it or not.
In UK, these machines violate child porn laws. I wonder why…
Comment by Buoyant 01.05.10 @ 12:16 pmHoly that chick is hot.
Don’t know why she has all that tape on underneath, though, and she’s also got weird underwear.
Comment by Doctor Man 01.05.10 @ 12:52 pmYour all missing the point… Do some reading on Falsflag events to increase “security” measures. Keeps the sheep in their place.
Watch Terrorstorm, Endgame, Fall of the Republic…etc
Comment by Ophiuchus 01.05.10 @ 1:17 pmIt’s plain and simple- Flying is a PRIVILEGE and not a right. B/c it is a privilege, you will have to abide by any rules/regulations, if you don’t like the scanner then don’t fly. Everyone is so fuckin oversensitive and afraid of their rights being violated.
Comment by Eddy 01.05.10 @ 1:47 pmWhen are you people gonna realize there are no terrorists,,only a gov that will do everything in there power to make you think there are, at all cost. You want to find the terrorists? Go to Washington.
Comment by Bill 01.05.10 @ 2:57 pmBouyant
If someonw watches my wife go through one of these scanners it is their own poor luck !
I have an Idea…How about Canadians fly Air Canada, Americans fly American Airlines ans so on and so on. If your country can’t afford an airline you stay home. As for the scanner I can see both sides of it. I know no one wants this to happen but they just may have to bite the bullet and racialy profile people. I know thats not very “PC” but either is seeing everyone almost naked including children. Protect your shores and regulate immigration while your at it.
Comment by Ryan 01.06.10 @ 6:23 amscanners cause dna chain termination and replication errors. so go ahead and get scanned. all you have to lose is your life.
Comment by dickbag 01.06.10 @ 10:05 amActually It’s already been admitted that the bodyscanners would have likely NOT have detected the detroit “bombing” (it was actually more like flaming underwear that wasn’t a bomb at all)
Comment by Brady 01.06.10 @ 11:25 amWhen will the intrusions on privacy stop? I for one do not feel comfortable with a grown man seeing a naked image of my wife in the name of security. It is true that I have the option of not flying (as sarcastically implied above) but that just merely dances around the real issue. In fact it’s a clear avoidance of reality and I fear that the continued path that all these security measures take will lead to something very imprisoning. Why such extremes taken yet no one are is questioning the tactics that failed to catch the underwear bomber in the first place and why they failed. Where was the security that existed after 9/11? The security dogs that could have sniffed out the chemicals? Or the tightened military presence? We obviously have the means to detect these bad guys without violating human rights and there are many cases where they already have. The airlines and the government failed this time around so they want the public to give up even more privacy as a result. Why have the CIA or FBI if there is no need for them to do their job. I mean why not just stop us from leaving our homes or just have us walk around naked. I think that the sacrifice of private dignity for safety is no excuse. This is one step closer to big brother that began with the patriot act. I would rather die for personal freedom, which is what makes us a target of these Islamic groups, then to give up my freedom and become just as controlled as they are of their own people. No amount of agreement with these acts will ever turn back the consequences. I am not saying let’s turn our back on better security measures but these scanners are clearly a step too far.
Comment by Dan Vieu 01.06.10 @ 7:36 pmThe police dogs at Grand Central Station and Body Scanning machines at the airport remind me of Nazi Germany. Are the Americans about to make the same mistake? You go right and you go left.Work Will Set You Free.
Comment by Leonard 01.07.10 @ 8:22 amWhat really annoys me is that in this screwed up world everyone is treated equally – good in theory – but impractical! If its the Muslim extremist blowing up planes and killing the innocent, then why does everyone have to be treated the same. Why cant we prioritise those that are likely, probable, or innocent.
If ALL Muslims were dealt with as high risk, then this would have an impact on the Muslim community to “out” the extremists, to ridicule them for the situatio they are now in.
In the UK, the Muslims were once a very liked and tollerated community. Now, we are told to tollerateand accept, but personal feelings are running high. I think this is how Nazi Germany started with the jews and we are seeing it with the Muslims. Its very sad, but the likes of the BNP and NF are becoming strong.
The extremists must stop and think cause its not a game!
Comment by A True Brit 01.07.10 @ 11:49 amLets look at the facts, The underwear bomber was on the watch list, he didn’t even have a passport, his own father called and reported him. So, the government failed on every level. But, we get scanners. Why don’t they work on getting their shit together first and then see if we need them. Or, was this just the excuse they need to take more of our privacy away. If they would have introduced the scanners a year ago, would we be up in arms about it? But not now because we are scared. Wake up people. They are taking advantage of us. Every little step they take, we get more used to it. This is becoming a police state. Open your eyes and use the internet for more then just facebook.
Comment by Chris 01.07.10 @ 2:17 pmThe communist flag is starting to sport the red,white, and blue.
Comment by Franklin 01.07.10 @ 4:30 pmTime for the culture jam! Next time I go through OHare I’m gluing X-ray-opaque aluminum foil letters to my tighty-whities saying “Tool Of Oppression” with an extra-long “p” to enhance the point. Or maybe “Objects in Scanner are Larger Than They Appear”. Or maybe just “Fuck You TSA”. They’re screwing me on the 4th Amendment, lets see if they screw me on the 1st as well.
Comment by Tom Treder 01.07.10 @ 6:30 pmhttp://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/46711.html
Comment by Duff 01.08.10 @ 8:33 amAnyone that is for this is a damn fool. Don’t you know that this is just one more step towards complete dehumanization? Once you are deprived of your right to privacy you are no more than an animal. What will come next ? Perhaps a version that police can truck around & see through your walls with in your own home. Who knows !? Maybe they will be watching you.. keeping you safe .. while your having sex ? I wonder how they would sell this ? Ohh we have got to put a stop to those meth labs popping up in neighborhoods or grow houses. Where does it end ? If you put up with this now you’ll be subjugated to any machinations these thugs come up with. Where does Safety end & privacy begin? Wake the hell up you damn fools !
Comment by Clay 01.08.10 @ 1:17 pmCHRIS !! the guy was led through By a CIA Operative ! THIS WAS PLANNED OUT BY GOVERNMENT TO MAKE YOU THINK THERE WAS A FAILURE SO YOU’LL BE CONVINCED TO GIVE UP MORE OF YOUR RIGHTS. Do you really want to be leading your kids through these things while pervs lust after them ? What happens if some freak likes what they see & comes to your home? How is that any safer for you or your family ? My god ! Our country is full of spineless idiots that are too afraid to speak up. Instead they teach you to rationalize it & accept it. WAKE UP STUPID !
Comment by Clay 01.08.10 @ 1:22 pmThis scanner may or may not have done much to detect some powder riding in his crotch. Besides, these nut jobs are already putting explosives inside their body cavities and triggering it with a cell phone. A body scanner does nothing to detect anything inside the body. This is just a paranoid response to a questionable terrorist attempt. Let’s just not question it though. It’s easier to panic and take drastic and stupid measures to believe we’re protecting ourselves.
Comment by Von 01.08.10 @ 2:28 pmI dont know who is the bigger criminal,the person trying to blow up the plane or the Peeping Tom stripping you and your family with the body scanner.
Comment by Josh 01.08.10 @ 3:27 pmIf body scanning old ladies and young children isnt a crime anymore then can Pee Wee Herman receive a Presidential Pardon?
Comment by Goldberg 01.08.10 @ 3:32 pmAnd does anyone believe them when they say the image is deleted right after they’re done checking out your junk? Think about it. If they scanned the crotch bomber and missed the powder, they’d want the image afterwards so they could go back and see how they missed it. Then they’ll start saying, “we keep the images on a secure server” which will eventually be hacked or someone working there will just thumbdrive images and next thing you know your bare butt is on the web. And since children are supposedly exempt, crafty terrorists will start bringing children along and put everything on them. This scanner does not magically make everyone safe. They’ll find a way to beat the system while average Joes and Janes are stupidly grabbing their ankles believing it’s the right thing to do.
Comment by Von 01.09.10 @ 12:33 pmhttp://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/are-planned-airport-scanners-just-a-scam-1856175.html
“Tests by scientists in the team at Qinetiq, which Mr Wallace advised before he became an MP in 2005, showed the millimetre-wave scanners picked up shrapnel and heavy wax and metal, but plastic, chemicals and liquids were missed.
“If a material is low density, such as powder, liquid or thin plastic – as well as the passenger’s clothing – the millimetre waves pass through and the object is not shown on screen. High- density material such as metal knives, guns and dense plastic such as C4 explosive reflect the millimetre waves and leave an image of the object.”
Comment by Von 01.09.10 @ 12:45 pmThe people posting comments that are pro-body scanners are CIA disinformation agents. No one would really approve of having their naked images viewed by strangers and stored in a database, lest they be perverts.
Comment by CIA 01.09.10 @ 2:27 pmBody scanners dont use dangerous radiation and Body scanners dont save images.Well heres another story at http://www.prisonplanet.com/get-naked-to-defeat-terrorists.html
Comment by William 01.09.10 @ 3:03 pmHow the hell can it be “rape” as so many have commented? The machine doesn’t insert anything into your ass, it only allows for the viewing of someone’s body and by any stretch of the definition – that isn’t rape. I hate when people try to use powerful words to increase the validity of their statement. You’re probably the same people who toss around the words “nazi” and “Hitler” like without any idea of what you’re actually saying.
Idiots.
Comment by The John 01.11.10 @ 6:42 amAny society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.
-Benjamin Franklin
Comment by Tom 01.11.10 @ 8:08 amThe image of the blond woman is FAKE. I am a Photoshop expert(using it since 1992) and this is not a real image taken from a body scanner.
Comment by Paul 01.11.10 @ 10:10 amThey should have two lines. One “express” line for those people who are willing to get scanned for safety and for the sake of quickness, and one line for those who opt out. The “opt out” line would include a thorough pat down, the shoe routine and perhaps a metal wand. I bet within a few years 95% of all people would opt for convenience and speed over saving their dignity.
Comment by Josh 01.11.10 @ 11:20 amI guess the people that are agreeing with these new perverted tactics dont know what happened in the jungles of Guyana in 1978 when 900 Americans ended up drinking the kool aid.They had been scared or brainwashed into believing that American soldiers were going to drop out of the sky .and torture them and their children.In the beginning they thought things werent really were going to get bad. They went ahead withh the program ,playing the game just like us, until it was too late . In the end they couldnt get out.They were sheeps too..Keep thinking it cant happen to you. and always remember the Nazis made the jews take off their clothes too..
Comment by Ozzie 01.11.10 @ 3:30 pmDoes this mean as a frequent flier I can sue TSA for giving me cancer from having to use a full body xray machine everytime I go through security? Sounds like better data mining would have prevented the last attempt. This wouldn’t have. Last time I checked america’s TSA didn’t work in Amsterdam.
Comment by johann 01.11.10 @ 3:59 pmThe “blurred, headless” pic is not the image you think the TSA will see. That is an edited image used for television. The actual image is crystal clear and shows the private parts quite clearly. Maybe you don’t care who sees your privates, but I do and so do millions, including parents of small children. If you are that afraid to fly, that you are willing to let strangers gawk at your naked children, then maybe you shouldn’t!
Comment by Jackie 01.11.10 @ 5:37 pmI call bullshit on the second photo. Backscatter x-rays don’t look like that. For instance, the picture has hair. And for another, it’s fake.
http://www.f1online.de/f1online/index.cfm?location=search&colNo=2274&language=1
Pic 518435 look familiar?
Comment by YouEediots 01.11.10 @ 6:07 pmAfter years of being discriminated against ,banned from city parks and not able to live near schools.Perverts are finally getting the recognition they deserve.The Federal Goverment is allowing them to apply for Federally funded jobs as TSA screeners.
Comment by Trevor 01.11.10 @ 6:19 pmYup,it’s definitely photoshopped. Here’s the source of the pics.
http://www.f1online.de/f1online/index.cfm?location=search&colNo=2274&language=1
I cant see the jews or the arabs subjecting their people to this type of indecency.You have to come from a special perverted breed to come up with type of shit.
Comment by Logan 01.11.10 @ 6:43 pmYou have to be pretty seriously immature as to believe your modesty takes priority over the safety of every man, woman and child on the plane. You want to roll the dice with your own life, be my guest.
I wonder if in the final moments before that plane smashes into the ground, would you really be thinking, “Well, at least nobody saw me naked.”
Everyone wants security from terrorism but doesn’t want to be inconvenienced in any way to achieve that goal.
You have genitals, so do I and so does everyone else. Get over it and grow up.
These should be mandatory at every airport in the world. If anyone is actually concerned about a cancer risk from 20 seconds in the scanner, throw in an optional side room where you can do an actual strip search.
Comment by Mike 01.12.10 @ 6:57 amThat image is a fake.
Comment by Dario 01.12.10 @ 7:20 amObviously the people who are so quick to get naked arent real Americans.You see the American Revolution wasnt won by Americans running around showing their privates.During World War 2 the Americans had to liberate countries where its ok to go to the beach and show your privates.The guys that attack us dont go around showing their privates .You see wars arent won by showing your privates .They are won by keeping your pants and boots on.
Comment by Franklin 01.12.10 @ 11:07 amI don’t know if the images are fake or not but what is for sure is that the “real” ones is just the positive of the negative “fake” ones.
Comment by Fred 01.12.10 @ 11:56 amForgive me if this has been pointed out…these invasion of privacy devices would NOT have stopped that attempt on Christmas day…this is not going to make anyone safer. I won’t fly if forced to do this…what a bunch of CRAP!!!
Comment by Randy 01.12.10 @ 12:46 pmIf you think that we should give up our rights for temporary security then aren’t we becoming just what the terrorist want us to become? An unfree society. Where you no longer have the right against unlawful searches and seizures? Didnt our fore fathers fight and die to establish and protect these rights? What would they do today? What kind of a world do YOU want to live in? I say someone is making a pretty good profit off of these scanners, and I say they should be investigated. Follow the money. The “terrorist” wasn’t alone http://www.mlive.com/news/detroit/index.ssf/2009/12/flight_253_passenger_kurt_hask.html. WAKE UP!!
Comment by Juan 01.12.10 @ 8:13 pmThis was a FALSE FLAG to get these machines put in place and as usual, the MSM Falsimedia acted like huge cheerleaders. May they rot in hell.
By the way, doesn’t it bother anybody that our government adamately refuses to secure our borders (while constantly blathering about Terrorism) has extremely lax immigration laws and caters extensively to illegal aliens?
Is anybody knowledgable about the NAU (North American Union)–the plan to merge: Canada, the U.S. & Mexico together?
I call that treason myself.
Comment by Roxan 01.12.10 @ 8:55 pmLet the Sheeple, (oops, I meant people)line up for this further degradation.
Didn’t anybody notice that the dude didn’t have a passport, his father warned about his son etc and the dipsticks still let him on board? Why was that allowed to happen?…I say, let the “security” people like Napalitano fry. They’re the idiots that were warned but did nothing to stop him from coming on board in the first place, but alas, the people are really Sheeple.
Also, think of this. There is the typical saying of, “If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear.”
My reply is to “Be be very wary of who you yield that power to.”
Comment by Roxan 01.12.10 @ 9:12 pmWhen nervous performers are afraid to go on stage they imagine everyone in the audience is naked. I think TPTB are afraid that the masses are getting pissed off enough to actually revolt and so in a similar manner they are forcing travelers to pass through naked body scanners. It’s another step towards stripping away the dignity from everyone who is not them. Eventually those obscene scanners will spread beyond the airports. So TPTB gain control over the masses by making them feel more and more vulnerable and the problem of a revolt is solved. All it took was a rather ridiculous false flag operation on Christmas day. The zombie patsy with no passport was escorted onto that plane by CIA/Mossad for gosh sake! It’s pathetic actually how easily people can be hoodwinked into submission.
Comment by M. Rocknest 01.13.10 @ 1:11 amThe picture with the pretty girl is a fake by the way. It’s a reverse coloring to make it look like a body scan. Body scan’s would not show any hair in the picture. Here is the link to the page of images that can be bought. I think people that are genuinely concerned about privacy need to stop trying to scare people with false propaganda and riling up the masses.
So if you like the girl and want to see more images go check it out. Also she already knows she is on the Internet. She is a model.
http://www.photoalto.com/index/fa/c.cd/cd/PA246
Comment by Jay 01.13.10 @ 12:19 pmThat’s wonderful to know that hair doesnt appear on the scanned images.Now we all know that we dont have to comb are hair before we get our bodies scanned.Can we say it again, maybe one more time,the pictures are fake,the girls got hair.Bottom line you and your family will appear bald and naked.Great picture.Smile and say cheese.
Comment by Leonard 01.13.10 @ 9:31 pmViewing new technology to heighten airport security as a jumping off point for suppression of human rights is as paranoid and delusional as anything I’ve ever heard.
The good news is, the new scanners should be able to pinpoint with precision just how far your head is lodged up your ass, and should help with surgically removing it.
Comment by Mike 01.14.10 @ 7:15 amMike knows from experience.What was the recovery period?
Comment by Franklin 01.14.10 @ 9:32 amMy attitude is this:
Which is more uncomfortable – Someone seeing your naked form?
OR . . .
Someone seeing your lifeless body in a coffin?
If you don’t want to have someone see your naked form, then plain and simple – DON’T FLY.
And by the way, “Dr. Mann”, you’re a real Sphincter Opening. I only wish that I could somehow tell you that to your face.
Comment by Cliffy44 01.14.10 @ 11:55 amAs has been pointed out above, real suicide bombers (as opposed to duped CIA/Mossad patsies) know very well that they are virtually guaranteed to succeed (as, indeed, one has done already) if they simply hide the explosives in their body cavities. And ultimately, the only way to counter this tactic without subjecting air passengers to repeated doses of medically dangerous deep penetrating radiation is to get them all to drop their pants and bend over for an intimate search.
Well, I can only presume that the response of Mike and his ilk will once again be: we all have rectums and half of us have vaginas (and those of our sons and daughters are just smaller), so get over it; no price in lost dignity is too high to pay for the illusion of safety.
All I can say is that when it happens the whole world (except the dumb American sheep) will know that “the terrorists” (whoever they really are) have well and truly won.
PS. Isn’t it a little bit suspicious to you, Mike, that former head of the DHS, Michael Chertoff, apparently has a financial interest in the company that has the contract to supply these new body scanners?
Comment by Ian 01.15.10 @ 7:20 amThanks Ian, you are absolutely right.Some of us Americans believe in supporting our Constitutional Rights while other Americans are out to violate them and make a profit. The U.S. Goverment needs to come up with a better plan and you can be sure it can be done.
Comment by Franklin 01.15.10 @ 11:05 amThe object of the scans is to detect the presence of explosives or weapons, not to display the human body. Isn’t the technology smart enough to ‘white out’ the body to reveal just the threat – that is what happens with conventional baggage X-rays.
Comment by Paul 01.17.10 @ 2:52 pmYes Paul ,im sure a scanner that shows a virtual image can be made that shows only the threat in great detail. An image can be produced that will get the job done that even a child could watch and understand witjout being porn.The threat can stickout on an image of a virtual body..An image that doesnt insult.An image anyone could look at ..You wouldnt even need to hide in another room to analyze. them.
Comment by Franklin 01.19.10 @ 12:49 pmTo those so “wisely” commenting that flying is a privilege or a service and we shouldn’t fly if we are not ready to give up on one of our few rights left to dignity:
-You are a bunch of brainwashed Mop heads!!!!
Then how come, I have to pay thousands of dollars every time I cross the ocean sitting crammed for 7-12 hours with my knees to my mouth? How would you like to pay full fare and ride a taxi cab in the trunk?
Get “out” in the world and stop watching and listening only to CNN and FOX. Just because you’ve seen/heard it on Tv/Radio, or it’s a law, doesn’t mean necessarily it is right.
We are becoming slowly but surely a communist society… (I wonder, is it maybe so contagious just because we buy to much Chinese made?)
the photo you have posted with the naked women is in fact a FAKE. It’s a photoshopped image taken from a stock photo site. Here is the link …. http://www.superstock.com/stock-photos-images/1569R-246002
Comment by Nick 01.26.10 @ 11:04 pmWhy don’t they just employ gay men to look at the women scans and lesbians to look at the male scans. That way nobody will be oogling the bodies, you have positive descrimination of sexual orientation and the job is done harmlessly.
Comment by Jon 02.01.10 @ 5:39 amThere are harmful and damage your GNS. These scanners cause DNA chain termination and replication errors.All you have to lose is your life.
Comment by Geo Tau Aisay 02.17.10 @ 9:13 pmWhy is it anytime someone tries to set their underwear on fire I have to pay for it by giving up more of my rights? Naked in public, no thanks.
This is wrong. Period.
~He who would trade liberty for some temporary security, deserves neither liberty nor security.
Ben Frankiln~
Body Scanners cause cancer and infertility! Have you ever heard of radiation? So a few people may not die from that lone “terrorist” who tries to shoot someone at an airport, but thousands, perhaps millions, will die of cancer or suffer from the ravages of chemotherapy. This is a free society. You have the privilege of being radiated and die of cancer.
Comment by Master of War 03.05.10 @ 4:10 pmNext: We all strip, undergo interviews and, if cleared, change into approved ‘passenger jumpsuits.’
Comment by randle 03.07.10 @ 1:36 pmThere is absolutely no way to guarantee security. Thre will always be risk and there will always be smart people who can beat the preventative measures with new techniques and countertech, I can think of 3 ways to fool these body scanners and I’ve only thought about it for 5 minutes.
Comment by Brien 03.10.10 @ 10:05 pmcool! I want one!
Comment by jim rivers 03.15.10 @ 2:56 pmThis is evil (the bible says in these last days men shall be inventors of evil things). This is pure ponography under the disguise of so-called protecting us from terrorism when these monsters who are creating and implementing these machines are the real terrorists. This naked machine should be demolished immediately. The goverment is not our Lord and they do not have the right to make any law and force what ever they want on us. This is pure communism and dictatorship that comes from foreign countries and beliefs. This is America not an evil foreign country. We need to tear those machines down! They have no money to feed America’s poor but they have all that money to build those evil machines. DO NOT RIDE AIRPLANES TILL THEY DESTROY THOSE MACHINES.
Comment by Ronnie 03.16.10 @ 4:58 pmWATCH ZEITGEIST and see Why they do that! http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/
Comment by Ricardo 03.17.10 @ 3:02 amLeave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>




